An excerpt from a new book by Scott Walter entitled “Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Transforming America,” has revealed who the next George Soros is going to be, which means our next Antichrist has been identified so we better begin to get ready to fight against this individual’s influence on our country and society.
If there’s some evil, wicked initiative being pushed by radical Democrats in our society, it’s almost a guarantee that it’s funded by Soros. This is a man who claims to be Jewish who, in World War II, actually sold out fellow Jews to Nazis for money. I mean, that in and of itself tells you everything you need to know about him.
According to the folks at The Daily Caller:
It’s a story that goes to the very heart of the Left’s mountain of shadowy funding and professional activism: a foreign billionaire infamous for illegally funding Democrats, enriched by selling ghoulish medical treatments that resulted in multiple deaths, and bankrolling a multimillion-dollar “dark money” campaign to transform America.
Meet Swiss-born Hansjörg Wyss (pronounced “Hans-yurg Veese”), perhaps the most important mega-donor you’ve never heard of. His Wyss Foundation, founded in 1998, quietly commands a stunning $2.7 billion in assets (as of 2021) and annually pours out tens of millions of dollars to activist groups—around a billion dollars between 2002 and 2021—so it’s little wonder he’s been called the “new George Soros.”
Wyss is one of the best-connected mega-donors on the left. He’s a member of the Democracy Alliance, a cabal of the rich and powerful that meets regularly to strategize funding to leftist activists. He’s also a substantial contributor to and sits on the board of the Center for American Progress, a leading liberal think tank founded by John Podesta, who chaired Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential campaign. Podesta has reportedly advised Wyss on his funding of public policy efforts, and Podesta and Wyss Foundation president Molly McUsic have collaborated on stealthy nonprofit schemes to win elections for the Democratic Party.
Wyss’s attempts to be directly involved in influencing American policy debates and election outcomes was noticed first back in May 2021, according to Walter’s book. The conservative leaning Americans for Public Trust filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, making the case that evidence that was already available already indicated “Mr. Wyss indirectly funded federal electoral advocacy through his nonprofit organizations, the Wyss Foundation and the Berger Action Fund. The intended recipient of these funds was ultimately a variety of organizations whose primary purpose is to engage in electoral advocacy.”
The complaint itself says that “the law prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions to political committees whether directly or indirectly,” due to the almost universal view that no foreign interests should be interfering with American elections.
What sucks is the FEC doesn’t really do a whole lot to enforce these laws, after a year of waiting and getting no results, the Americans for Public Trust decided to sue in the later part of April 2022. The point of the lawsuit was to encourage the Commission to open a probe into the allegedly illegal donations to leftists groups and various Democratic politicians made by Wyss. That list includes Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, former Rep. Jay Inslee of Washington, and former Rep. Mark Udall of Colorado.
Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions of any kind “in connection with any federal, state, or local election,” according to the FEC. It’s also illegal for campaigns, PACs, and other such organizations “to knowingly accept such donations from a foreign national.”
With the lawsuit pressing it, the FEC general counsel finally produced a document with recommendations for what the commission should do regarding Wyss and his relations with the Arabella network. The general counsel said an investigation into Arabella’s Sixteen Thirty Fund’s relations with its largest grant recipients in the 2018 and 2020 election cycles should be conducted, to see if the group should have been registered as a PAC, rather than a 501(c)(4) nonprofit. Even with evidence already available, the general counsel found grave violations and recommended that the FEC “Find reason to believe that the Sixteen Thirty Fund and The Hub Project”—the latter launched and sustained through the Arabella network by Wyss and his nonprofits—had “violated 52 U.S.C. §§ 30102, 30103, and 30104 by not registering as a political committee and meeting the Act’s organizational, record keeping, and reporting requirements.”
“The complaint to which the FEC general counsel responded alleges the Hub Project has served as a vehicle for the political spending of Mr. Wyss. This is demonstrated by the fact that Mr. Wyss has not publicly disclosed his role in founding the Hub Project. Neither his influence nor his financial support can be found anywhere on the group’s website. Indeed, the intrepid New York Times reporter only learned of Wyss’s connection to the Hub Project with the help of “interviews with five people with knowledge of The Hub Project, an internal memo from another liberal group that was obtained by the New York Times, and the appearance of The Hub Project’s business plan in a tranche of data made public by WikiLeaks,” the excerpt continued.
The book also reveals that even the New York Times says it’s not a conspiracy theory cooked up by crazy right-wingers in tinfoil helmets to say that Wyss is actually playing a significant role in shaping the politics of our country in very powerful ways, especially when it comes to environmental policy, which is something the man cares deeply about.
For example, the Times observes, the Hub Project appeared in 2015 “as a sort of incubator for groups backing Democrats and their causes,” and it “created more than a dozen groups with anodyne-sounding names that planned to spend $30 million attacking Republican congressional candidates before the 2018 election.”
Since it seems no one is actually taking the threat Wyss poses seriously, it looks likely that his influence is here to stay, thus, in the future, he’s going to be the person we need to battle against in order to preserve our liberty. He will no doubt take the place of George Soros when the old codger decides to clock out.