Vice President Kamala Harris and live, unscripted interviews that are aired on television go together like anchovies and peanut butter. No matter how many different spices or sauces you try and sprinkle on top, it’s still going to taste like garbage scraped off the bottom of a dumpster. A great case in point is Harris’ interview with extremely annoying and unfunny late night talk show host Steven Colbert. During the conversation, Harris made an attempt to showcase her accomplishments during her time as vice president.
As you might imagine, she failed spectacularly.
I mean, you can’t outline achievements when none exist, right?
When Colbert asked Harris to provide details on policy changes she’s put in place, she metaphorically high-tailed it to a narrative that basically communicated that since she’s the vice president she essentially does nothing. Not untrue in her case.
Colbert asked the Democratic Party nominee, “Well, your opponent and his vice president, the other night in the debate, said, well, Kamala Harris has been Vice President for three and a half years, why hasn’t she fixed everything already? Can you describe to them what the job of vice president is like, and what have you told Gov. Tim Walz (D) about the job? Have you described to him the vast powers vested in the vice presidency?”
Harris started her usual stumbling and fumbling about in the darkness of the massive, cavernous space between her shoulders trying to wave away any sort of assumption of “vast powers” that are associated with being the veep, saying, “I have pointed out, through my three and a half years of being Vice President, that it’s Vice President. And there are a lot of responsibilities that you take on. But, did you see that kid who was interviewed after their debate? And — oh, you have to see it, Stephen — and he gave just a total civics lesson about the role of vice president.”
via Breitbart:
Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow pointed out in August that Democrats’ reasons for supporting Harris for president consisted of her “vibe,” and her being “good for women” rather than an arc of political accomplishments. During an interview on the Charlie Kirk Show, Marlow referred to a video in which Frontlines reporter Kalen D’Almeida questioned several supporters of Harris at a rally in Phoenix, Arizona, and asked them what Harris’s accomplishments were. Marlow noted that among the reasons listed as to why people were supporting Harris, none of the people listed a “single accomplishment.” Instead he pointed out “so far” voters had stated they supported Harris for her “vibe,” because she was “good for women,” and that she “won the vice presidency.”
At the end of the day, there’s only a couple of reasons why anyone is supporting Harris for president. She’s a black woman and she’s not Trump. That’s it. Her policies are atrocious and essentially the same garbage we’ve already had pushed on us by President Joe Biden. Her intelligence quotient is somewhere south of nonexistent, so nobody wants her because she is smart and has good ideas.
Being empty-headed and submissive means she’s easy to control, to make into a puppet for whoever is really calling the shots within the Democratic Party. And that’s why the powers-that-be on the left simply adore her.